Vioxx
only the beginning; antidepressants and statin drugs are medication
timebombs
There's a much bigger story than you might think about the recent
hoo-ha concerning Vioxx being pulled from the market. It's not
just about Vioxx or Merck, the drug's manufacturer. Virtually
all prescription drugs that are heavily marketed by pharmaceutical
companies today are harmful to human physiology. Every drug has
unintended side effects, and almost no drugs undergo thorough
testing. This is one of the great misunderstood points about
modern medicine -- people think that the FDA approves drugs only
after they have been adequately tested on large numbers of people
for several years. They think that drugs must be "proven" safe
before the FDA will approve them. But this is not the case at
all; in fact, the FDA is increasingly approving drugs after very
short trials. I've seen drugs approved after 12 weeks of testing
on a couple hundred people. That's hardly the threshold of credibility
that should be required of prescription drugs before they are
unleashed on the public and marketed to tens of millions of people
along with instructions that tell people to be taking these for
life.
That's one of the big scams in the pharmaceutical industry --
these drugs are tested on a few hundred people (or sometimes
only a few dozen people) for very short durations, such as a
couple of months or weeks, and then they are approved by the
FDA on fast track programs and heavily marketed to the general
public with instructions that they should be used for a lifetime.
Vioxx, it turns out, was a sleeping giant of a problem. It was
a hidden landmine that people were taking on a daily basis, thinking
it was doing them some good. But the real risk to Vioxx only
became apparent after people were taking it for a period of years.
Well, the question remains -- what other prescription drugs
have the same problems that are only going to become apparent
years later? I can give you the answer to two of those right
now, and that is antidepressant drugs and statin drugs. On the
antidepressant drugs front, the evidence is now starting to emerge.
We're finding that drug companies distorted clinical trials,
withheld information from the FDA, and then suppressed negative
studies that would have shown quite clearly the correlation between
antidepressants and violent behavior / suicides.
In contrast, there is very little talk about statin drugs and
the hidden dangers they pose to human health. We have tens of
millions of people now either taking statin drugs or considering
taking them in order to lower their LDL cholesterol, based on
advice from their doctors. For their part, doctors and physicians
are heavily hyping up statin drugs and claiming that nearly everyone
should be taking these for life because "they're so good
for you." There's even been talk of dripping statin drugs
into the water supply -- an idea that is so outlandish as to
be truly bizarre, even for Big Pharma.
People who take statin drugs today are going to learn something
quite interesting five or ten years from now. What they're going
to learn is what people who have been taking Vioxx are learning
today, which is that these drugs are not adequately tested, that
there are severe side effects, and that a person's total health
is actually reduced when they take prescription drugs.
Let's face it -- drug companies sell the promise of health,
longevity, and cures for diseases. They use imagery that makes
you think you might be healthy by taking their drugs. They spend
billions of dollars on promotion to convince people that their
lives will be happier and healthier if they would only purchase
these pills and take them on a regular basis. They promise all
of this, but they deliver none of it. In contrast, what they
actually deliver is liver toxicity, brain confusion, birth defects,
imbalanced physiology, and a chain reaction of biological side
effects that are only now beginning to surface in the scientific
community.
Patent medicines are toxic chemicals that are not suitable for
human consumption. And the more heavily marketed a prescription
drug is, the worse it ends up being for you. What we need to
do as a society is learn from these mistakes. It's time to take
a much closer look at the highly corrupt relationship between
the FDA and pharmaceutical companies. It's time to re-examine
the drug approval process and demand a much higher standard of
safety. It's time to hold pharmaceutical companies financially
accountable for the death and the harm they cause to tens of
millions of customers who consume their products and who suffer
the health consequences as a result.
It's time to stop pushing drugs onto consumers as something
they should be taking for a lifetime, and start reverting back
to the only justifiable role of prescription drugs that a society
should allow: the temporary, emergency use of them to balance
acute metabolic or biological disorders to give the patient enough
time to make lifestyle changes that could bring their health
back into balance. And finally, it's also time to ban all direct-to-consumer
advertising by pharmaceutical companies. These ads, which are
plastered across television stations, billboards, and seem to
dominate magazines and newspapers these days, do nothing but
unduly influence customers, causing them to request overpriced,
brand name prescription drugs from their doctors, even when they
have no clue whatsoever what the drugs do for them. Direct-to-consumer
advertising is partly responsible for this current Vioxx mess,
and it is something that should be outlawed in our nation in
order to protect the health of the public.
Let's get serious about this. Patients don't have the training
to determine whether they should be taking certain prescription
drugs -- this is a decision that doctors should be making. So
why are pharmaceutical companies allowed to advertise directly
to the general public in the first place? The kind of system
we should have in place is a system where all drug trial results
are publicly posted in an open-source database, and then where
doctors can have free and open access to that database to decide
on their own what drugs might be useful in certain limited situations.
Virtually all pharmaceutical marketing, advertising, and public
relations should be outlawed, including the pharmaceutical influence
in medical schools and drug rep visits to doctor's offices.
Until we are willing to step up and put a limit on the influence
and reach of the pharmaceutical industry, we as a nation are
going to continue to collide with results like we're seeing here
with Vioxx. And this is just the tip of the iceberg. The increase
in heart attack and strokes from taking Vioxx was rather small,
but there are no doubt other prescription drugs that have far
more dangerous side effects, and I believe that includes statin
drugs which will someday be the source of a major class-action
lawsuit against Big Pharma.
As an end user, what can you do to protect yourself from the
hidden, unknown side effects of prescription drugs? The answer
is simple: don't work with any doctor who uses drugs as a first
resort. Find yourself a naturopathic physician, and do everything
you can in terms of changing your lifestyle, engaging in physical
exercise, getting natural sunshine, and pursuing a highly nutritious
diet in order to enhance your health and prevent disease so that
you don't need prescription drugs in the first place.
Remember, the human body has a blueprint for health. All you
need to do is provide it with the building blocks it needs and
engage in the kinds of activity for which it was designed. Your
body can achieve health on its own, without chemical additives
in the form of prescription drugs. In fact, the minute you start
taking a prescription drug, your health begins to decline, and
it is very difficult to reverse.
By the way, for those suffering from arthritis and inflammation,
here are two simple things you can do to reduce that inflammation.
Number one, drink lots of water, because often inflammation is
a result of a state of chronic dehydration. And number two, avoid
drinking cow's milk, because dairy products actually promote
stagnation -- and to some degree, various allergic reactions
throughout the body which may be misdiagnosed as arthritis.
Also, be sure to get plenty of vitamin D, and the best way to
do that is to get natural sunlight on your skin on a regular
basis. Dr. Colick, author of the UV Advantage, recommends that
people with fair skin get 5-10 minutes a day, 3 days a week in
order to get adequate vitamin D into their diet. As he explains
it, many people who suffer from aches and arthritis are actually
suffering from nothing more complicated than a chronic vitamin
D deficiency, because they aren't getting sunlight and they aren't
getting vitamin D in their diet.
So, if you do these three things -- avoiding cow's milk and
dairy products, drinking lots of water each day, and getting
vitamin D into your diet through exposure to natural sunlight
or by taking cod liver oil as a nutritional supplement -- you
will find that most of your aches and pains are fading away in
the first place.
Bottom line is, people don't need Vioxx. What they need is an
education about what really works, not only to reverse the symptoms
of arthritis, but to engage in a healthy lifestyle that prevents
chronic disease in the long run. |
|